?

Log in

Hermione Grainger and the Methods of Rationality - Input Junkie
August 28th, 2010
03:40 pm

[Link]

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Hermione Grainger and the Methods of Rationality
I've been enjoying Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality (Petunia marries a professor, so Harry is raised in a good home and is very familiar with science and science fiction), but I have some problems with the way Hermione is in the story. In order to see whether I'm an outlier on this, here's a poll:

How plausible do you think the Methods of Rationality Hermione is?

Extremely plausible-- I'm very like her or I know someone very like her
1(4.3%)
Very plausible-- she makes a lot of sense to me
5(21.7%)
Plausible enough-- good in the story, and I've never thought about whether she's plausible
9(39.1%)
Incoherent-- plausible in some chapters but not in others
3(13.0%)
Incoherent-- doesn't seem like the same character through the story and generally implausible
2(8.7%)
Does not seem like a human being
0(0.0%)
Some other possibility (please describe in comments)
3(13.0%)

(10 comments | Leave a comment)

Comments
 
[User Picture]
From:agrumer
Date:August 28th, 2010 08:02 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I find his version of Hermione both more plausible and more faithful to Rowling's original than his version of Harry.
[User Picture]
From:carbonel
Date:August 28th, 2010 08:05 pm (UTC)
(Link)
which is entirely reasonable, given that Harry is the most AU thing about the story.
[User Picture]
From:interactiveleaf
Date:August 28th, 2010 08:19 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Well, the whole point of the fic was "what if you changed harry but left everything else the way it was" so I don't know that "more faithful than Harry" is either a faint or great praise.
From:(Anonymous)
Date:August 28th, 2010 10:40 pm (UTC)
(Link)
That's very much *not* the point of the fic. (The author even wrote about that.) Quirrell, for example, is completely different from and not as a consequence of Harry changing.
[User Picture]
From:interactiveleaf
Date:August 28th, 2010 10:51 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Okey doke.
[User Picture]
From:carbonel
Date:August 28th, 2010 08:04 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I'd call her implausible and not a terribly good match to canon (too self-aware about some things, mostly) but reasonably consistent.

Also, you do not have an "I would like to complain about this poll" option.
[User Picture]
From:supremeherptile
Date:August 28th, 2010 08:05 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Maybe a cabbage or something.
[User Picture]
From:selenite
Date:August 28th, 2010 08:12 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Not that I'd call her *very* plausible, but she's more plausible than MoR!Harry.
From:bruce9999999
Date:August 28th, 2010 11:38 pm (UTC)

Very plausible- I had a grade school crush on someone like that

(Link)
Met her years later- she's really like that. My biased opinion. Happily married, happy for her- bah.
[User Picture]
From:houseboatonstyx
Date:August 29th, 2010 03:56 am (UTC)
(Link)
Fwiw, I was so disgusted with the treatment of both MacGonagal and Hermione that I stopped reading.

Neither of them should be shown as such wimps to stand for AU-Harry's abuse.

At one point the author said in a meta-comment that he realized he was dropping anvils on other characters, but this was a first draft. I hope later drafts improve what could be a very good book!
nancybuttons.com Powered by LiveJournal.com