nancylebov (nancylebov) wrote,

The Feds and Land Use

An article from the NYTimes reviews two books which argue that large scale Federal policies have had a major and mostly bad, effect on land use in the US, partly a matter of encouraging people to build in dangerous areas and partly a matter of encouraging people spread out more than they otherwise would. In particular, one of the books argues the Federal highway system was designed in case of conventional war and the push to get people into the suburbs was dispersal in case of nuclear war.

The latter seems fairly stupid--I'm not sure if it didn't occur to them that small towns and cities would be a better idea, or if by the time it was clear that people were aggregating around big cities, the nuclear war thing had been forgotten, or if no one can figure out a way, even with the Feds leaning on it, to get people to live in small towns and cities. Or maybe the idea was to get people out of city centers, without much thought about where they'd decide to live instead. I leave open the possibility that encouraging people to move into the suburbs had some other purpose, though.

In any case, the article recommends looking for Federal solutions to the problem, which sounds rather risky--the whole point of Federal solutions is that they can override individual judgement on a large scale. Any suggestions for how the Feds could withdraw from that arena in a sensible way?
  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded