nancylebov (nancylebov) wrote,
nancylebov
nancylebov

Cloverfield

I'd call it a little better than fair-to-middling with some good unusual features. I'm sure you should see it if you want to see the complete range of horror movies, but otherwise, you'd better really like Lovecraftian-looking monsters. No hint of Lovecraftian cosmology, but I'm not sure that can be done in a movie.

Let's see how much I can say without having spoilers. I'll put any spoilers in my first comment.

The best thing about the movie was the monsters. The worst thing was that the people weren't very interesting.

The big monsters were exceedingly fine--scary, alien, and very smooth CGI. The close view of a monster's face changing near the end of the movie had me thinking that I don't want to see that in my dreams, and I think that's the first time I've had that reaction to a movie. Their noises were also satisfactorily scary.

The little crab/spider/scorpion things were good, but not extraordinary.

The main character was an unusual choice -- he's got much more courage than most, but he isn't an athlete, and certainly not a CGI superhero. If only he could act better.

The failures of realism I noticed were that apparently New York has no children or old people, and no handguns. That last would have been useless against the bad monsters, but the little (maybe a yard across) crab/spider/scorpions would have had a much rougher time of it.

As you may have heard, the movie is mostly (entirely?) shown as hand-held camera video. I handled the unstable point of view well enough while I was watching the movie, but felt a little queasy afterwards. I'd say that anyone who was ok with Waking Life should be able to manage the camera work easily.

Emotionally, I feel as though it's about bewildering, frightening time right after 9/11.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 2 comments