This is kind of neat, not just in that it gives hope for better treatments for a debilitating disease, or that it supports cynicism because if the theory is right, then Crohn's sufferers were being given exactly the wrong treatment, but because it's a result of careful thought and checking the evidence.
The decade of medical backtracking
I had breast cancer back in 2000, and I am trying to come up with a way that I can use that experience to shed some light on these new findings. I have never believed that everything happens for a reason. But I do feel very strongly that everything happens so that it can be turned into a column.
Whatever the moral would be, I don’t think it helps Representative Camp’s argument. I had mammograms every year like clockwork, and I had just gotten a clean bill of health from my latest one when I found a lump on my left breast while watching a rerun of “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” multitasker that I am.
It turned out to be cancer, of a fairly low-grade variety. My oncologist felt strongly that it never would have developed if I hadn’t taken estrogen replacement therapy — another one of the medical marvels that has now been consigned to the Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time category.
So, in summary, the cutting-edge of medical thinking of the 1990s may have induced my cancer, and then the universally recommended testing protocol failed to detect it.
If this isn't evidence that the Flynn Effect means something, I don't know what is. I can remember when medical humor for the general public consisted of funny stories about doctor visits.
Second link thanks to osewalrus.