A massive planet found orbiting a star at a staggeringly great distance is smashing some long-held theories of planetary formation, researchers say.
The planet, according to a study published online Thursday in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, is unlike anything in our own solar system.
Eleven times more massive than Jupiter, planet HD 106906 b orbits a single sun-like star at a distance of 60 billion miles - about 650 times the distance Earth is from our own sun.
"This system is especially fascinating because no model of either planet or star formation fully explains what we see," said study coauthor Vanessa Bailey, an astronomy graduate student at the University of Arizona.
Researchers estimate the planet is very young, just 13 million years old, and the residual heat from its formation can be seen from Earth as infrared energy. Researchers used infrared cameras and the Magellan telescope in the Atacama Desert in Chile to capture images of the planet.
(Up until recently, astronomers relied on orbiting spacecraft like the Hubble Space Telescope to capture clear images of exoplanets. Now, Earth-based telescopes like Magellan employ new technology to compensate for the distorting effects of Earth's atmosphere.)
Astronomers are puzzled by the planet's existence.
Scientists believe that planets that orbit close to stars are formed from the gas, dust and asteroid-like debris that encircle a young star. They believe also that this process is too slow for extremely large planets to form so far from a star.
Authors of the paper speculate that HD 106906 b and its sun might have begun forming at the same time, in the manner that binary stars form. In this case, however, the massive planet never quite became a star.
Binary star systems are formed when two nearby clumps of gas collapse and form separate stars. Because they are so close, they each exert gravitational force and orbit one another.
"It is possible that in the case of the HD 106906 system the star and planet collapsed independently from clumps of gas, but for some reason the planet's progenitor clump was starved for material and never grew large enough to ignite and become a star," Bailey said.
Blockquote is the whole article at ontd.
The thing that caught my eye was that we were actually picking up the heat, but the LA Times didn't mention how distant the planet was-- Wikipedia to the rescue! It's three hundred light years away, and my sense of wonder is strongly tweaked by the idea of picking up heat from a far distant planet. Yes, I know, infra read astronomy has been around for a long time and analyzing from a telescope isn't like feeling it on your own skin, but still....
As usual, news of this kind makes me miss Poul Anderson, who used astronomical discoveries in his science fiction. So far as I know, no one else is quite doing the same thing-- Kim Stanley Robinson does (especially in 2312, but he keeps it in the solar system.
There's a petition to name the planet Gallifrey.
This entry was posted at http://nancylebov.dreamwidth.org/1029092.html. Comments are welcome here or there. comments so far on that entry.