Log in

No account? Create an account
Rush Limbaugh's epistomology - Input Junkie
January 15th, 2014
01:22 pm


Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Rush Limbaugh's epistomology

A comparison of how Limbaugh decided to defend Clarence Thomas in spite of not knowing anything about him (Thomas is a "true conservative") but is disappointed that Republicans are including a caveat about whether Christie lied.

Here's the money quote from Limbaugh: " Now, if there were a fervent ideological foundation, if there was a substantive reason of believing in Governor Christie, then whether he lied wouldn't matter. They'd be out there defending him left and right just to make sure the Democrats don't get away with this."

Limbaugh's mere existence depresses me a lot less than the fact that he's popular.

This entry was posted at http://nancylebov.dreamwidth.org/1030927.html. Comments are welcome here or there. comment count unavailable comments so far on that entry.

(4 comments | Leave a comment)

[User Picture]
Date:January 15th, 2014 06:42 pm (UTC)
Limbaugh's mere existence depresses me a lot less than the fact that he's popular.

Now, that's a money quote.
Date:January 17th, 2014 06:47 am (UTC)
Honesty been taking a back seat in politics a long time. I don't even listen to official statements from politicians of either party anymore. It's all filtered through PR people.
[User Picture]
Date:January 18th, 2014 12:02 am (UTC)
This kind of thing is why I proposed the panel on political discourse for Conjecture. I've never actually seen or listened to Limbaugh, but I have the impression he's a perfect model of what I think of as the rhetorical mode.
[User Picture]
Date:January 18th, 2014 06:12 pm (UTC)
Okay, my eyes are tired; I just read that as Rush Limbaugh's episiotomy.

Edited at 2014-01-18 06:13 pm (UTC)
nancybuttons.com Powered by LiveJournal.com