I'm going to do a bit of a summary because I realize not everyone reading this is on Facebook, or wants to be.
Alexei Panshin has been discussing on Facebook whether Heinlein was a Sufi. Not to keep you in suspense, but there's no evidence that Heinlein was a Sufi, or even knew about Sufism.
Cory Panshin brought up that Heinlein didn't seem to want the human race to become different, which led to me thinking about sf about transcendence.
Here's something I wrote:
When I was a kid, I really liked Childhood's End, and then it occurred to me that the Overmind might just be eliminating competitors, and the human race was eaten rather than achieving transcendence.
As I recall, humanity was stopped from investigating psychic powers so it wouldn't become "a telepathic cancer spreading through the stars". From one angle, humanity could become just that. From the other angle, the Overmind could already be just that.
It's a gamble in general. True religion or destructive cult?
Which authors see the human race as needing to become something very different?
John Varley ("Persistence of Vision", _The Ophiuchi Hotline).
Sturgeon (_More that Human_, _The Cosmic Rape_, and less drastically "If All Men Were Brothers, Would You Let One Marry Your Sister?")
John Brunner: (modest levels of change) (_Stand of Zanibar_, _The Stone that Never Came Down_)
Any suggestions for someone more recent?
Alexei Panshin has written The World Beyond the Hill - Science Fiction and the Quest for Transcendence.
This entry was posted at http://nancylebov.dreamwidth.org/1062115.html. Comments are welcome here or there. comments so far on that entry.